{"id":28,"date":"2006-01-27T19:04:52","date_gmt":"2006-01-28T00:04:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/2006\/01\/27\/determining-due-dates-timed-vs-ultrasonic\/"},"modified":"2006-07-24T13:11:02","modified_gmt":"2006-07-24T18:11:02","slug":"determining-due-dates-timed-vs-ultrasonic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/2006\/01\/27\/determining-due-dates-timed-vs-ultrasonic","title":{"rendered":"Determining Due Dates &#8211; <i>Timed<\/i> vs. <i>Ultrasonic<\/i>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It turns out that there are two ways to determine the baby&#8217;s due date. Neither are very exact, but since it&#8217;s quite wordy for someone to say that we&#8217;re due the &#8220;last quarter of May, first quarter of June&#8221;, they just give us a single date.<\/p>\n<p>Of the two ways to determine a due date, <strong>Timed<\/strong> is the method you use from the beginning, where the doctor takes into account certain physiological (gals, you know what I mean&#8230;guys, you don&#8217;t need to know) dates, use their little magic wheel of baby time, and figure out when 9 months (or 40 weeks) will occur.  To me, this seems like the method that makes the most sense.<\/p>\n<p>The second way of determining a due date, which I call <strong>Ultrasonic<\/strong>, is done by measuring the ultrasound image.  The doctor measures the baby, then thinks to herself, &#8220;hmmmm&#8230;if the baby is 1 pound 15 ounces, with a head diameter of 200 mm, abdomen diameter of 220 mm, and femur length of 35 mm, then I would guess that the real due date is 6 days earlier!&#8221;  (actually, she just punches these numbers into her ultrasound machine and it chugs out the date)<\/p>\n<p>Now, to answer Amy&#8217;s question of 2 days ago, either the baby is coming 6 days earlier than originally expected, or the baby is 6 days bigger than the ultrasound machine expects him to be when he&#8217;s born!  Uhhhhh&#8230;I bet you can guess which theory Sarah prefers&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>But both methods are accurate to +\/-2 weeks, so this whole entry was immaterial anyways!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It turns out that there are two ways to determine the baby&#8217;s due date. Neither are very exact, but since it&#8217;s quite wordy for someone to say that we&#8217;re due the &#8220;last quarter of May, first quarter of June&#8221;, they &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/2006\/01\/27\/determining-due-dates-timed-vs-ultrasonic\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-new-baby"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fredman.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}